Student Reviewers: Melita, Victoria, Sasha

Topic Reviewed: User-created Content

A Graphic Organiser Summary of our Feedback:

Criteria-based Feedback:

Criteria Descriptors
Peer Reviewer Feedback
Quality of Content

Does the content (writing) make sense?
It is quite hard to understand at times,
and there are some minor spelling mistakes.
Has the content allowed you to acquire new knowledge (facts) and motivated you to investigate further?
This has been an interesting trend but we wouldn't investigate further
Can you identify any areas which need clarification?
No we can not
Pose three questions that arise from your reading
What specifically is user-created-content? We are still a little bit unsure.
Communication / Collaboration

Look at the Discussion pages of the wiki pages - is there effective communication?
Yes there is heaps of communication
Do they need more?
No everything is fine
Are they clear in their messages to each other?
Yes there are clear messages
Is there a sense of negotiation and collaboration?
No we haven't seen any in the discussion tab
Does the work appear to be equally shared?
Yes everyone seems to be doing the same amount of work which is great
Does there appear to be any difficulties by one or more members of the team?
We noticed that someone was having trouble posting a video to someone else
Presentation - Layout and Design

Look closely at the amount and relevance of graphics/images and media - Is there enough? Too much
I think there could be one more video clip added to the page to make it a bit more interesting
What kinds of graphics/images and media have been used?
The have used one video clip
Do the graphics/images and media used support the content of the project?
Do you have any recommendations to improve the layout and design of the project?
No we think it's really good

Summary of Feedback:

Use the 321 graphic organiser to help prepare a summary of your peer review.
  • 3 good things about the wiki project
  • 2 improvements for the wiki project
  • 1 piece of new knowledge that your group has acquired due to these high school students participating in the Horizon Project

Upload the pdf 321 to your Feedback page.

Technorati Tags: user_content hz07 hz07 horizonproject07

Self Reflection

Self-assessment requires you to evaluate your own thought processes.
Your paragraph should reflect on the following questions and be 6 -8 complete sentences long. There should be no spelling errors.
  • What was the most difficult part of this review for you?
  • What do you think you should do next?
  • If you could do this task again, what would you do differently?
  • What did you learn from this review?

Use the html code brackets to hyperlink your name and create a page
Peer Reviewer
Self-Reflection Paragraphs

Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here