Student Reviewers: Olivia, Carrie

Topic Reviewed: Social Networking

A Graphic Organiser Summary of our Feedback:

Criteria-based Feedback:

Criteria Descriptors
Peer Reviewer Feedback
Quality of Content

Does the content (writing) make sense?
Olivia and I being only 11
found it quite difficult to understand some of the words so we didn't really know what the writing meant.
Has the content allowed you to acquire new knowledge (facts) and motivated you to investigate further?

Can you identify any areas which need clarification?
there were alot of new words that we hadn't heard before.So
just keep in mind that students from primary and middle school
will be reading your work and they may find it very hard to follow.
Pose three questions that arise from your reading

Communication / Collaboration

Look at the Discussion pages of the wiki pages - is there effective communication?
There are no messages on the discussion tab
Do they need more?
no, i don`t think you need more infomation, but might want to read it over to your-self.
Are they clear in their messages to each other?
There are no messages on the discussion tab.
Is there a sense of negotiation and collaboration?

Does the work appear to be equally shared?

Does there appear to be any difficulties by one or more members of the team?

Presentation - Layout and Design

Look closely at the amount and relevance of graphics/images and media - Is there enough? Too much
There are enough pictures and they are good because they are
equivalent to the writing.
What kinds of graphics/images and media have been used?
videos(interviews), cartoons, pics.
Do the graphics/images and media used support the content of the project?
Do you have any recommendations to improve the layout and design of the project?
Make the headings more obvious. Maybe a different font.

Summary of Feedback:

Use the 321 graphic organiser to help prepare a summary of your peer review.
  • 3 good things about the wiki project
  • 2 improvements for the wiki project
  • 1 piece of new knowledge that your group has acquired due to these high school students participating in the Horizon Project

Upload the pdf 321 to your Feedback page.

Technorati Tags: social_networking hz07 hz07 horizonproject07

Self Reflection

Self-assessment requires you to evaluate your own thought processes.
Your paragraph should reflect on the following questions and be 6 -8 complete sentences long. There should be no spelling errors.
  • What was the most difficult part of this review for you?
  • What do you think you should do next?
  • If you could do this task again, what would you do differently?
  • What did you learn from this review?

Use the html code brackets to hyperlink your name and create a page
Peer Reviewer
Self-Reflection Paragraphs

Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here