Student Reviewers: Adam, Kendra, Olivia, Melita, Santana, Dylan & Ms H


Topic Reviewed: New Scholarship and Emerging Forms of Publication Feedback


A Graphic Organiser Summary of our Feedback to you:


Criteria-based Feedback:


Criteria Descriptors
Peer Reviewer Feedback
Quality of Content

Does the content (writing) make sense?
At times the writing was confusing as it didn't quite make sense to us. Overall, the information was easier to understand than the actual Horizon Report.
As we are not from America, some terms did not make any sense to us and there were a lot of references to the US government but not other governments.
Can you identify any areas which need clarification?
Some sentences don't make sense, they seem to be a bit mixed up.
Pose three questions that arise from your reading
We would like to know more about the "new flexible paper".
When will the new Perfect Book printing machines be in our part of the world?
What is ecto? What is Moodle?
Communication / Collaboration

Look at the Discussion pages of the wiki pages - is there effective communication?
Yes the project manager communicates very well and keeps the group together. She seems to be a great leader.
Do they need more?
No their communication is very good compared to other groups.
Are they clear in their messages to each other?
Yes but at times they used words like Gah and some people used exite.
Is there a sense of negotiation and collaboration?
Normally the team seems to always come to an arrangement or take the better idea
Does the work appear to be equally shared?
Almost everyone did the same amount of work with the help of their manager
Does there appear to be any difficulties by one or more members of the team?
The team seems to have minor difficulties but they seem to have been easily solved through communication
Presentation - Layout and Design

Look closely at the amount and relevance of graphics/images and media - Is there enough? Too much
It was hard to tell what media was gotten from other sources and what media had been created by the members of the project.
What kinds of graphics/images and media have been used?
Videos, graphics (logos, images)
Do the graphics/images and media used support the content of the project?
Sometimes we felt that the videos (from other sources) went off the topic a little bit and didn't really help us to understand the impacts of the trend.
Do you have any recommendations to improve the layout and design of the project?
More space between the sections of discussion topics. Bigger headings to help show where different parts of the topic start.

Summary of Feedback:


Use the 321 graphic organiser to help prepare a summary of your peer review.
  • 3 good things about the wiki project
  • 2 improvements for the wiki project
  • 1 piece of new knowledge that your group has acquired due to these high school students participating in the Horizon Project

Upload the pdf 321 to your Feedback page.

Technorati Tags: scholarship hz07 hz07 horizonproject07


Self Reflection:


Self-assessment requires you to evaluate your own thought processes.
Your paragraph should reflect on the following questions and be 6 -8 complete sentences long. There should be no spelling errors.
  • What was the most difficult part of this review for you?
  • What do you think you should do next?
  • If you could do this task again, what would you do differently?
  • What did you learn from this review?

Use the html code brackets to hyperlink your name and create a page
Peer Reviewer
Self-Reflection Paragraphs

Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here