Student Reviewers: Santana, Alex, Logan

Topic Reviewed: Mobile Phones A Graphic Organiser Summary of our Feedback:

Criteria-based Feedback:

Criteria Descriptors
Peer Reviewer Feedback
Quality of Content

Does the content (writing) make sense?
The writing is very easy to read and
Has the content allowed you to acquire new knowledge (facts) and motivated you to investigate further?
It has motivated us to look more into the future of
mobile phones.They are very interesting devices.
Can you identify any areas which need clarification?
There were a couple of mistakes.
Pose three questions that arise from your reading
Communication / Collaboration

Look at the Discussion pages of the wiki pages - is there effective communication?
There are no messages in the discussion.
Do they need more?
Are they clear in their messages to each other?
There are none.
Is there a sense of negotiation and collaboration?
Yes there is a sense of negotiation when you look below the images there are names.
Does the work appear to be equally shared?
Yes there does seem to be equally shared with all the names.
Does there appear to be any difficulties by one or more members of the team?
Yes, their communication.
Presentation - Layout and Design

Look closely at the amount and relevance of graphics/images and media - Is there enough? Too much
Yes there are enough and they help so much with all the new stuff to come.
What kinds of graphics/images and media have been used?
Videos,sites with images of the mobile phones to come and the videos with the students on there telling you what will it be like next decade or more.
Do the graphics/images and media used support the content of the project?
They do because we watch them and they then give us the knowledge of what this trend is really going to look like.
Do you have any recommendations to improve the layout and design of the project?
We think you're group could make the headings a bit more noticeable from where the subjects change.

Summary of Feedback:

Use the 321 graphic organiser to help prepare a summary of your peer review.
  • 3 good things about the wiki project
  • 2 improvements for the wiki project
  • 1 piece of new knowledge that your group has acquired due to these high school students participating in the Horizon Project

Upload the pdf 321 to your Feedback page.

Technorati Tags: mobile hz07 hz07 horizonproject07

Self Reflection

Self-assessment requires you to evaluate your own thought processes.
Your paragraph should reflect on the following questions and be 6 -8 complete sentences long. There should be no spelling errors.
  • What was the most difficult part of this review for you?
  • What do you think you should do next?
  • If you could do this task again, what would you do differently?
  • What did you learn from this review?

Use the html code brackets to hyperlink your name and create a page
Peer Reviewer
Self-Reflection Paragraphs

Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here