Student Reviewers: Adam, Dylan & Reid

Topic Reviewed: Massively Multiplayer Educational Games

A Graphic Organiser Summary of our Feedback:

Criteria-based Feedback:

Criteria Descriptors
Peer Reviewer Feedback
Quality of Content

Does the content (writing) make sense?
Yes the writing makes a lot of sense.
Has the content allowed you to acquire new knowledge (facts) and motivated you to investigate further?
Yes I have learned many new facts and it has motivated us to find out more.
Can you identify any areas which need clarification?
The nintendo surgerey paragraph needs a little clarification.
Pose three questions that arise from your reading
No questions have come to us because the team exsplaned it all.
Communication / Collaboration

Look at the Discussion pages of the wiki pages - is there effective communication?
The team used reasonable communication but some other groups used more effective communication.
Do they need more?
Yes the team needs to have used more communication.
Are they clear in their messages to each other?
Yes apart from the spelling which may have been difficult to understand.
Is there a sense of negotiation and collaboration?
They used good negotiation.
Does the work appear to be equally shared?
The team worked very well and shared their work very well.
Does there appear to be any difficulties by one or more members of the team?
None but the minor problems which were solved easily.
Presentation - Layout and Design

Look closely at the amount and relevance of graphics/images and media - Is there enough? Too much
There is a good amount of images and graphics.
What kinds of graphics/images and media have been used?
They have used viedos and images(that relate to the topic)
Do the graphics/images and media used support the content of the project?
The graphics/images and media support the project to the best.
Do you have any recommendations to improve the layout and design of the project?
Some titles need to be a little bigger.But the project is very easy to understand.

Summary of Feedback:

Use the 321 graphic organiser to help prepare a summary of your peer review.
  • 3 good things about the wiki project
  • 2 improvements for the wiki project
  • 1 piece of new knowledge that your group has acquired due to these high school students participating in the Horizon Project

Upload the pdf 321 to your Feedback page.

Technorati Tags: educational_games hz07 hz07 horizonproject07

Self Reflection:

Self-assessment requires you to evaluate your own thought processes.
Your paragraph should reflect on the following questions and be 6 -8 complete sentences long. There should be no spelling errors.
  • What was the most difficult part of this review for you?
  • What do you think you should do next?
  • If you could do this task again, what would you do differently?
  • What did you learn from this review?

Use the html code brackets to hyperlink your name and create a page
Peer Reviewer
Self-Reflection Paragraphs

Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here
Your name here