Reviewers: Ms H and Room18 Students


Topic Reviewed: Globalisation and Outsourcing


A Graphic Organiser Summary of our Feedback:


Criteria-based Feedback:


Criteria Descriptors
Peer Reviewer Feedback
Quality of Content

Does the content (writing) make sense?

Has the content allowed you to acquire new knowledge (facts) and motivated you to investigate further?

Can you identify any areas which need clarification?

Pose three questions that arise from your reading

Communication / Collaboration

Look at the Discussion pages of the wiki pages - is there effective communication?

Do they need more?

Are they clear in their messages to each other?

Is there a sense of negotiation and collaboration?

Does the work appear to be equally shared?

Does there appear to be any difficulties by one or more members of the team?

Presentation - Layout and Design

Look closely at the amount and relevance of graphics/images and media
- Is there enough? Too much?

What kinds of graphics/images and media have been used?

Do the graphics/images and media used support the content of the project?

Do you have any recommendations to improve the layout and design of the project?


Summary of Feedback:


Use the 321 graphic organiser to help prepare a summary of your peer review.
  • 3 good things about the wiki/video topic
  • 2 improvements for the wiki/video topic
  • 1 piece of new knowledge that your group has acquired due to these high school students participating in the Flatclassroom Project 2007

Upload the pdf 321 to your Feedback page.

Technorati Tags: flatclassroomproject07


Self Reflection

Self-assessment requires you to evaluate your group's thought processes.
Your paragraph should reflect on the following questions and be 6 -8 complete sentences long. There should be no spelling errors.
  • What was the most difficult part of this review for you?
  • What do you think you should do next?
  • If you could do this task again, what would you do differently?
  • What did you learn from this review?